Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Arthur W. Tifford, P.A. v. Litigation Concepts, L.C.

Arthur W. Tifford, P.A. v. Litigation Concepts, L.C.

89 So. 3d 1072, 2012 WL 2011964, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8880
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 6, 2012
DocketNos. 3D10-2045, 3D10-2044, 3D10-1277
StatusPublished

This text of 89 So. 3d 1072 (Arthur W. Tifford, P.A. v. Litigation Concepts, L.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arthur W. Tifford, P.A. v. Litigation Concepts, L.C., 89 So. 3d 1072, 2012 WL 2011964, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8880 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm, holding that the trial court properly entered final summary judgment in favor of appellees on appellants’ claims for breach of contract and fraudulent inducement. See Faro v. Romani, 641 So.2d 69, 71 (Fla.1994) (holding “when an attorney withdraws from representation upon his own volition, and the contingency has not occurred, the attorney forfeits all rights to compensation.”).

We likewise affirm the trial court’s orders denying each party’s motion for sanctions pursuant to section 57.105, Florida Statutes (2010), finding no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s determinations.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Faro v. Romani
641 So. 2d 69 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 So. 3d 1072, 2012 WL 2011964, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arthur-w-tifford-pa-v-litigation-concepts-lc-fladistctapp-2012.