Arthur Velasco v. United States

371 F.2d 588, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 7631
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 27, 1967
Docket23057_1
StatusPublished

This text of 371 F.2d 588 (Arthur Velasco v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arthur Velasco v. United States, 371 F.2d 588, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 7631 (5th Cir. 1967).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The defendant Arthur Velasco appeals from his conviction on three counts of an indictment charging him, Reinaldo Perez and Clarence Thompson with the unlawful sale of a narcotic drug, cocaine, and with conspiracy to do so. His sole contention on appeal is that the district court erred in admitting in evidence a spoon with traces of cocaine upon it, his contention being that the spoon had been obtained through an illegal search of an automobile.

There was direct evidence of a sale of cocaine by Velasco to a federal narcotic agent in the Miami International Airport. During the course of the negotiations between Velasco and the agent and before the sale of cocaine was consummated Velasco left the airport terminal building and was seen to converse with defendant Perez who was seated in the automobile in question which was parked in the airport parking lot. Thereafter Velasco arranged for the federal agent to receive from defendant Thompson a key to a locker in the terminal building containing the narcotics. After examining the cocaine the agent gave a signal, other agents immediately arrested Velasco, Perez was arrested near the parked. automobile, the automobile was *589 searched and the spoon in question was found.

We are satisfied that under these circumstances the search of the automobile and the seizure of the spoon to which Velasco objects were not unlawful but were, rather, a valid search and seizure made incident to, and immediately following, Velasco’s arrest for a felony committed in the presence of the arresting officers. It was, therefore, not error to admit the spoon in evidence.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
371 F.2d 588, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 7631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arthur-velasco-v-united-states-ca5-1967.