Arthur v. Stringer

835 So. 2d 986, 2002 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 409, 2002 WL 1003871
CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama
DecidedMay 17, 2002
Docket2991062
StatusPublished

This text of 835 So. 2d 986 (Arthur v. Stringer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arthur v. Stringer, 835 So. 2d 986, 2002 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 409, 2002 WL 1003871 (Ala. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

On Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

PITTMAN, Judge.

The prior judgment of this court has been affirmed in part and reversed in part, and the case remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. See Ex parte Arthur, 835 So.2d 981 (Ala.2002). On remand to this court and in compliance with the supreme court’s opinion, we affirm the judgment of the circuit court as to Richard Arthur and reverse the judgment as to Ashley Arthur; the cause is remanded to the circuit court for proceedings consistent with the supreme court’s opinion.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED.

YATES, P.J., and CRAWLEY, THOMPSON, and MURDOCK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Arthur
835 So. 2d 981 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
835 So. 2d 986, 2002 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 409, 2002 WL 1003871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arthur-v-stringer-alacivapp-2002.