Arthur v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Arthur v. State

1971 OK CR 104, 482 P.2d 617

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 10, 1971

DocketNo. A-16196

StatusPublished

This text of 1971 OK CR 104 (Arthur v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arthur v. State, 1971 OK CR 104, 482 P.2d 617 (Okla. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

NIX, Judge:

Plaintiff in Error, Richard M. Arthur, appeals to this Court from a conviction in the District Court of Oklahoma County for the crime of Indecent Exposure, Case No. CRF-70-760, wherein he was sentenced to Four Years in the penitentiary. This cause was lodged in this Court on June 23, 1970, and no briefs have been filed. This cause was Summarily Submitted for opinion in accordance with Rule 1.9 of this Court. We have repeatedly held that where the defendant appeals from a judgment and sentence and no briefs are filed, this Court will examine the records for fundamental error only. If none appears of record, the judgment will be affirmed.

This Court has carefully examined the record and reviewed the testimony and find no fundamental error. The evidence is sufficient. It is the opinion of this Court that the judgment and sentence be affirmed.

BRETT, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OPINION

NIX, Judge:

Plaintiff in Error, Richard M. Arthur, appeals to this Court from a conviction in the District Court of Oklahoma County for the crime of Indecent Exposure, Case No. CRF-70-760, wherein he was sentenced to Four Years in the penitentiary. This cause was lodged in this Court on June 23, 1970, and no briefs have been filed. This cause was Summarily Submitted for opinion in accordance with Rule 1.9 of this Court. We have repeatedly held that where the defendant appeals from a judgment and sentence and no briefs are filed, this Court will examine the records for fundamental error only. If none appears of record, the judgment will be affirmed.

This Court has carefully examined the record and reviewed the testimony and find no fundamental error. The evidence is sufficient. It is the opinion of this Court that the judgment and sentence be affirmed.

BRETT, J., concurs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1971 OK CR 104, 482 P.2d 617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arthur-v-state-oklacrimapp-1971.