Arthur v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Arthur v. State

112 S.E. 292, 28 Ga. App. 576, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 712

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 11, 1922

Docket12911

StatusPublished

This text of 112 S.E. 292 (Arthur v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arthur v. State, 112 S.E. 292, 28 Ga. App. 576, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 712 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The defendant was convicted of seduction. In the light of the facts of the ease, and the entire charge of the court, none of the alleged errors in the charge require a new trial. There was some evidence which authorized the verdict, and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The defendant was convicted of seduction. In the light of the facts of the ease, and the entire charge of the court, none of the alleged errors in the charge require a new trial. There was some evidence which authorized the verdict, and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 S.E. 292, 28 Ga. App. 576, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arthur-v-state-gactapp-1922.