Arthur v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Arthur v. State

107 So. 924, 21 Ala. App. 659

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 16, 1926

Docket7 Div. 130.

StatusPublished

This text of 107 So. 924 (Arthur v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arthur v. State, 107 So. 924, 21 Ala. App. 659 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

We have carefully examined all the evidence adduced upon the trial of this case, as shown by the record. It was totally insufficient to warrant, the conviction of this appellant, and in overruling the defendant’s motion to exclude the evidence the court committed reversible error. Under the whole evidence, the defendant was entitled to his discharge. Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

We have carefully examined all the evidence adduced upon the trial of this case, as shown by the record. It was totally insufficient to warrant, the conviction of this appellant, and in overruling the defendant’s motion to exclude the evidence the court committed reversible error. Under the whole evidence, the defendant was entitled to his discharge. Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

107 So. 924, 21 Ala. App. 659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arthur-v-state-alactapp-1926.