Arthur v. Smith

1 So. 3d 1184, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 668, 2009 WL 212056
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 30, 2009
Docket1D08-5013
StatusPublished

This text of 1 So. 3d 1184 (Arthur v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arthur v. Smith, 1 So. 3d 1184, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 668, 2009 WL 212056 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Court has determined that the claims disposed of by the orders on appeal are inextricably intertwined with the claims and counterclaims that remain pending, and that the appeal is therefore premature. Cf. Mass. Life Ins. Co. v. Crapo, 918 So.2d 393 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). Accordingly, the appellees’ Motion to Dismiss Appeal as Premature, filed on November 5, 2008, is hereby granted and the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The appellants’ Motion to Supplement the Record, filed in November 12, 2008, is denied.

WOLF, LEWIS, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Massachusetts Life Ins. Co. v. Crapo
918 So. 2d 393 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 So. 3d 1184, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 668, 2009 WL 212056, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arthur-v-smith-fladistctapp-2009.