Arthur v. Smith
This text of 1 So. 3d 1184 (Arthur v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Court has determined that the claims disposed of by the orders on appeal are inextricably intertwined with the claims and counterclaims that remain pending, and that the appeal is therefore premature. Cf. Mass. Life Ins. Co. v. Crapo, 918 So.2d 393 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). Accordingly, the appellees’ Motion to Dismiss Appeal as Premature, filed on November 5, 2008, is hereby granted and the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The appellants’ Motion to Supplement the Record, filed in November 12, 2008, is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 So. 3d 1184, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 668, 2009 WL 212056, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arthur-v-smith-fladistctapp-2009.