Arthur v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections
864 F.3d 1259, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 18113, 2017 WL 2274012
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Arthur v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections. Read the opinion of the Court — 840 F.3d 1268 →
Opinions
A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges in active service on this Court having voted against granting'a rehearing en banc, it is ORDERED that this case will not be reheard en banc. The motion for a stay of execution is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Arthur v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, 864 F.3d 1259, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 18113, 2017 WL 2274012 (11th Cir. 2017).
864 F.3d 1259 (Arthur v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bounds v. Smith
430 U.S. 817 (Supreme Court, 1977)
Ronald Smith v. Warden
672 F. App'x 956 (Eleventh Circuit, 2016)
Grayson v. Dunn
221 F. Supp. 3d 1329 (M.D. Alabama, 2016)
Arthur v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections
680 F. App'x 894 (Eleventh Circuit, 2017)