Arthur v. Arthur
129 A. 178, 98 N.J. Eq. 393, 13 Stock. 393, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 614
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for-the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Advisory Master Grey.
*404 For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, KatzenbAoh, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Busicirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Arthur v. Arthur, 129 A. 178, 98 N.J. Eq. 393, 13 Stock. 393, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 614 (N.J. 1925).
129 A. 178 (Arthur v. Arthur) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.