Arthur Saylor v. John R. Fowler

Sixth Circuit

Arthur Saylor v. John R. Fowler

221 F.2d 796, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3569

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedApril 13, 1955

Docket12279_1

StatusPublished

This text of 221 F.2d 796 (Arthur Saylor v. John R. Fowler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arthur Saylor v. John R. Fowler, 221 F.2d 796, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3569 (6th Cir. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered by the Court on the record, briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties;

And the Court being of the opinion that the findings of fact made by the District Judge are supported by the evidence and are not clearly erroneous;

And that there was no error in the conclusions of law based thereon, and in the holding that certain conveyances of real estate were made with the fraudulent intent to hinder, delay and defraud the creditors of Arthur Saylor and that the appellee, as one of said creditors, acquired by the institution and prosecution of this action a lien against said property to secure the payment of his judgment debt against Arthur Saylor; *797 Pope v. Cawood, 293 Ky. 660, 170 S.W.2d 55; First National Bank of Jackson v. Short, 234 Ky. 130, 27 S.W.2d 668.

It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered by the Court on the record, briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties;

And the Court being of the opinion that the findings of fact made by the District Judge are supported by the evidence and are not clearly erroneous;

And that there was no error in the conclusions of law based thereon, and in the holding that certain conveyances of real estate were made with the fraudulent intent to hinder, delay and defraud the creditors of Arthur Saylor and that the appellee, as one of said creditors, acquired by the institution and prosecution of this action a lien against said property to secure the payment of his judgment debt against Arthur Saylor; *797 Pope v. Cawood, 293 Ky. 660, 170 S.W.2d 55; First National Bank of Jackson v. Short, 234 Ky. 130, 27 S.W.2d 668.

It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

221 F.2d 796, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arthur-saylor-v-john-r-fowler-ca6-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack