Arthur S. Curtis, and Telecommunications and Telephone Association, Inc., a Non-Profit Association Federally Chartered v. Bowen, Sec.

852 F.2d 565, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 9782, 1988 WL 76271
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 20, 1988
Docket88-2001
StatusUnpublished

This text of 852 F.2d 565 (Arthur S. Curtis, and Telecommunications and Telephone Association, Inc., a Non-Profit Association Federally Chartered v. Bowen, Sec.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arthur S. Curtis, and Telecommunications and Telephone Association, Inc., a Non-Profit Association Federally Chartered v. Bowen, Sec., 852 F.2d 565, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 9782, 1988 WL 76271 (4th Cir. 1988).

Opinion

852 F.2d 565
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Arthur S. CURTIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
and
Telecommunications and Telephone Association, Inc., a
non-profit association federally chartered, Plaintiff,
v.
BOWEN, Sec., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 88-2001.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 26, 1988.
Decided: July 20, 1988.

Arthur S. Curtis, appellant pro se.

Paula Pugh Newett (Office of the United States Attorney); Stanley Ericsson (U.S. Department of Health & Human Services), for appellee.

Before WIDENER, SPROUSE and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Arthur S. Curtis appeals from the district court's order dismissing his action for the reinstatement of Social Security medical and retirement benefits on the ground that Curtis has not yet exhausted his administrative remedies as required by 42 U.S.C. Sec. 405(g) and (h). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Curtis v. Bowen, C/A No. 87-565-A (E.D.Va. Oct. 30, 1987). Curtis' motion for partial summary judgment is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davis-El (Clyde M., Jr.) v. Robinson (John)
852 F.2d 565 (Fourth Circuit, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
852 F.2d 565, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 9782, 1988 WL 76271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arthur-s-curtis-and-telecommunications-and-telephone-association-inc-a-ca4-1988.