Arthur Rookard v. United States
This text of 212 F.2d 464 (Arthur Rookard v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Arthur ROOKARD, Appellant
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 11622.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued April 21, 1954.
Decided April 29, 1954.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.
Mr. Arthur Rookard filed a brief pro se.
Mr. Samuel J. L'Hommedieu, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Leo A. Rover, U. S. Atty., and William J. Peck, Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., at time brief was filed, were on the brief, for appellee. Messrs. Lewis A. Carroll and E. Riley Casey, Asst. U. S. Attys., Washington, D. C., entered appearances for appellee. Messrs. Charles M. Irelan, U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., at time record was filed, and William R. Glendon, Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., at time record was filed, also entered appearances for appellee.
Mr. Richard W. Galiher, Washington, D. C., amicus curiæ, appointed by this Court.
Before EDGERTON, WILBUR K. MILLER, and FAHY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant complains of denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 from a conviction and sentence for grand larceny. We find no error.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
212 F.2d 464, 94 U.S. App. D.C. 419, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 3391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arthur-rookard-v-united-states-cadc-1954.