Arthur R. Decatur v. United States
392 F.2d 29, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7712
Opinion
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Appellant mainly relies on a claim of illegal search and seizure. It is possible that there was an exploratory search too broad to be properly incident to De-Catur’s arrest. But it would appear that all of the tangible real objects offered in evidence were seized from points immediately adjacent to the spot where De-Catur was arrested. If some item crept into evidence that was illegally seized, no record was made in the trial court and we are not told what it was.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Arthur R. Decatur v. United States, 392 F.2d 29, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7712 (9th Cir. 1968).
392 F.2d 29 (Arthur R. Decatur v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
M. Rudolph Preuss, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Crosby Teletronics Corp. v. General Electric Co., Inc.
392 F.2d 29 (Second Circuit, 1968)