Home/U.S. Customs Court/Arthur R. Cone, Inc. v. United States

Arthur R. Cone, Inc. v. United States

29 Cust. Ct. 409, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1642
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedDecember 2, 1952
DocketNo. 56962; protests 177131-K, etc. (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 29 Cust. Ct. 409 (Arthur R. Cone, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arthur R. Cone, Inc. v. United States, 29 Cust. Ct. 409, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1642 (cusc 1952).

Opinion

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bird’s-foot trefoil seed (Lotus corniculatus) similar in all [410]*410material respects to that the subject of Transcontinental Seed, Inc. (Alltransport, Incorporated) v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 163, C. D. 1462), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Transcontinental Seed, Inc. v. United States
29 Cust. Ct. 163 (U.S. Customs Court, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 Cust. Ct. 409, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arthur-r-cone-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1952.