Arthur Nazzaro v. Martin Weiner and Texstyle Dyeing & Printing Corp., a Corporation of the State of New York, Cross-Appellants
This text of 353 F.2d 537 (Arthur Nazzaro v. Martin Weiner and Texstyle Dyeing & Printing Corp., a Corporation of the State of New York, Cross-Appellants) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
353 F.2d 537
Arthur NAZZARO, Appellant,
v.
Martin WEINER and Texstyle Dyeing & Printing Corp., a
Corporation of the State of New York, Cross-Appellants.
Nos. 15174, 15175.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued Oct. 18, 1965.
Decided Nov. 3, 1965.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey; Reynier J. Wortendyke, Jr., Judge.
Donald A. Robinson, Newark, N.J. (Shanley & Fisher, Attorneys for Plaintiff-Appellant and Cross-Appellee, Newark, N.J., David S. Cramp, Newark, N.J., on the brief), for Appellant in 15174 and for appellee in 15175.
Leonard I. Garth, Paterson, N.J. (Cole, Berman & Garth, Attorneys for Defendants-Appellees and Cross-Appellants, Paterson, N.J. on the brief), for Appellants in 15175 and for Appellee in 15174.
Before McLAUGHLIN, FORMAN and GANEY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
In these appeals the allowance of voluntary nonsuits to the parties and of costs to the defendants was clearly within the trial court's discretion.
The orders of the district court will be affirmed on the opinion of Judge Wortendyke, 38 F.R.D. 430.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
353 F.2d 537, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arthur-nazzaro-v-martin-weiner-and-texstyle-dyeing-printing-corp-a-ca3-1965.