Arthur Murray v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
This text of 239 F.2d 642 (Arthur Murray v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
239 F.2d 642
Arthur MURRAY, Petitioner,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
No. 12952.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
December 10, 1956.
Petition to Review Decision of the Tax Court.
Eichenbaum, Scott & Miller, W. S. Miller, Jr., Little Rock, Ark., for petitioner.
Charles K. Rice, John Potts Barnes, John N. Stull, Robert N. Anderson and John M. Morawski, Washington, D. C., for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties filed herein, it is ordered and decreed that this petition for review may be, and it hereby is, dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
239 F.2d 642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arthur-murray-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-ca6-1956.