Arthur McElroy v. Janssen Pharmaceutica
282 F. App'x 510
Opinion
Arthur McElroy appeals the district court’s 1 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) dismissal of his pro se products-liability claims against Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc. and Janssen Pharmaceutica, N.V. 2 Upon de novo review, see Reis v. Walker, 491 F.3d 868, 870 (8th Cir.2007), we conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons stated by the district court.
Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and appellees’ pending motion is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Arthur McElroy v. Janssen Pharmaceutica, 282 F. App'x 510 (8th Cir. 2008).
282 F. App'x 510 (Arthur McElroy v. Janssen Pharmaceutica) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jan Reis, Plaintiff/counter v. Hulon Walker, Defendant/counter
491 F.3d 868 (Eighth Circuit, 2007)