Arthur, Matthew
This text of Arthur, Matthew (Arthur, Matthew) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-78,277-01
EX PARTE MATTHEW ARTHUR, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 114-2515-06-A IN THE 114TH DISTRICT COURT FROM SMITH COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of injury to a child
and sentenced to fifteen years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.
Applicant contends that his guilty plea was involuntary, “timely pass for plea” procedures
violate the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses, and attorney fees were assessed even though
he was found indigent.
Applicant’s attorney-fee claim is dismissed. In re Daniel, 396 S.W.3d 545 (Tex. Crim. App.
2013). His remaining claims are denied. Accordingly, this application is dismissed in part and 2
denied in part.
Filed: October 7, 2015 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Arthur, Matthew, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arthur-matthew-texcrimapp-2015.