Arthur M. Parker, Jr., and Tom K. Wheeler v. Louise O. Wellborn

261 F.2d 767, 104 U.S. App. D.C. 301
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided November 20, 1958·No. 14473_1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants sued to reform a contract under which they had given appellee a series of notes. She filed a counterclaim on those notes which had become due and was given judgment thereon, although the issues as to reformation had not been reached. The court expressly determined, however, in accordance with Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 1 there was no just reason for delay as to the counterclaim. This appeal is from the judgment awarded on the matured notes.

The claims of the appellants remain undetermined, and are not affected by the judgment on the counterclaim. We find no error.

Affirmed.

1

. 28 U.S.C.A.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arthur M. Parker, Jr., and Tom K. Wheeler v. Louise O. Wellborn, 261 F.2d 767, 104 U.S. App. D.C. 301 (D.C. Cir. 1958).

261 F.2d 767 (Arthur M. Parker, Jr., and Tom K. Wheeler v. Louise O. Wellborn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bank of New York v. Hoyt
108 F.R.D. 184 (D. Rhode Island, 1985)