Arthur M. Parker, Jr., and Tom K. Wheeler v. Louise O. Wellborn

D.C. Circuit

Arthur M. Parker, Jr., and Tom K. Wheeler v. Louise O. Wellborn

261 F.2d 767, 104 U.S. App. D.C. 301

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedNovember 20, 1958

Docket14473_1

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 261 F.2d 767 (Arthur M. Parker, Jr., and Tom K. Wheeler v. Louise O. Wellborn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arthur M. Parker, Jr., and Tom K. Wheeler v. Louise O. Wellborn, 261 F.2d 767, 104 U.S. App. D.C. 301 (D.C. Cir. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants sued to reform a contract under which they had given appellee a series of notes. She filed a counterclaim on those notes which had become due and was given judgment thereon, although the issues as to reformation had not been reached. The court expressly determined, however, in accordance with Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 1 there was no just reason for delay as to the counterclaim. This appeal is from the judgment awarded on the matured notes.

The claims of the appellants remain undetermined, and are not affected by the judgment on the counterclaim. We find no error.

Affirmed.

1

. 28 U.S.C.A.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI