Arthur Lee Southworth v. Tina Ramshur Southworth

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 9, 2007
Docket13-07-00237-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Arthur Lee Southworth v. Tina Ramshur Southworth (Arthur Lee Southworth v. Tina Ramshur Southworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arthur Lee Southworth v. Tina Ramshur Southworth, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-07-237-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

__________________________________________________________ _



ARTHUR LEE SOUTHWORTH, Appellant,



v.



TINA RAMSHUR SOUTHWORTH, Appellee.



On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

of Montgomery County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



MEMORANDUM OPINION



Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



Appellant, ARTHUR LEE SOUTHWORTH, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the County Court at Law No. 4 of Montgomery County, Texas, in cause number 05-02-01532-CV. No clerk's record has been filed due to appellant's failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk's fee for preparing the clerk's record.

If the trial court clerk fails to file the clerk's record because the appellant failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk's fee for preparing the clerk's record, the appellate court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

On June 28, 2007, notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant was given ten days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellant.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant's failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk's fee for preparing the clerk's record, this Court's notice, and appellant's failure to respond, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

PER CURIAM



Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 9th day of August, 2007.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Arthur Lee Southworth v. Tina Ramshur Southworth, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arthur-lee-southworth-v-tina-ramshur-southworth-texapp-2007.