Arthur Lee Gooden, II v. Mr. Ponton Sergeant Terry Captain Booker Ms. Scott Mr. Smith Mr. Cei John B. Taylor L.W. Huffman

Fourth Circuit

Arthur Lee Gooden, II v. Mr. Ponton Sergeant Terry Captain Booker Ms. Scott Mr. Smith Mr. Cei John B. Taylor L.W. Huffman

56 F.3d 61, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19090, 1995 WL 318754

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 26, 1995

Docket95-6240

StatusPublished

This text of 56 F.3d 61 (Arthur Lee Gooden, II v. Mr. Ponton Sergeant Terry Captain Booker Ms. Scott Mr. Smith Mr. Cei John B. Taylor L.W. Huffman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arthur Lee Gooden, II v. Mr. Ponton Sergeant Terry Captain Booker Ms. Scott Mr. Smith Mr. Cei John B. Taylor L.W. Huffman, 56 F.3d 61, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19090, 1995 WL 318754 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

56 F.3d 61
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Arthur Lee GOODEN, II, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Mr. PONTON; Sergeant Terry; Captain Booker; Ms. Scott;
Mr. Smith; Mr. Cei; John B. Taylor; L.W.
Huffman, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-6240.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 20, 1995.
Decided May 26, 1995.

Arthur Lee Gooden, II, appellant pro se.

Pamela Anne Sargent, Asst. Atty. Gen., Richmond, VA, for appellees.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gooden v. Ponton, No. CA-95-45-R (W.D.Va. Jan. 12, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

56 F.3d 61
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Arthur Lee GOODEN, II, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Mr. PONTON; Sergeant Terry; Captain Booker; Ms. Scott;
Mr. Smith; Mr. Cei; John B. Taylor; L.W.
Huffman, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-6240.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 20, 1995.
Decided May 26, 1995.

Arthur Lee Gooden, II, appellant pro se.

Pamela Anne Sargent, Asst. Atty. Gen., Richmond, VA, for appellees.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gooden v. Ponton, No. CA-95-45-R (W.D.Va. Jan. 12, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 F.3d 61, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19090, 1995 WL 318754, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arthur-lee-gooden-ii-v-mr-ponton-sergeant-terry-ca-ca4-1995.