Arthur Lauderdale v. Attorney Grievance Commission

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided June 13, 2011·No. 143001·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

June 13, 2011 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Marilyn Kelly Stephen J. Markman Diane M. Hathaway 143001 Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra, Justices ARTHUR LAUDERDALE, Plaintiff, SC: 143001 v AGC: 0179/08 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant. ____________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, it appearing that the Attorney Grievance Commission has re-opened the investigative file which is the subject of the complaint, the complaint for superintending control is DISMISSED as moot.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. June 13, 2011 _________________________________________ Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arthur Lauderdale v. Attorney Grievance Commission, (Mich. 2011).

Arthur Lauderdale v. Attorney Grievance Commission (Arthur Lauderdale v. Attorney Grievance Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.