Arthur Kahn Co., Inc. v. Switzer Brothers, Inc.
This text of 201 F.2d 55 (Arthur Kahn Co., Inc. v. Switzer Brothers, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause has been heard upon appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, 101 F.Supp. 541, denying a motion for temporary injunction forbidding defendants (now appellees) from prosecuting a patent infringement suit in the Northern District of Texas until final judgment has been rendered in the case at bar;
And it appearing that, as of today, an appeal is now pending in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit from a decree of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas in such patent infringement suit, and this court being of opinion that, regardless of whether or not the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio whose order is sought to be reviewed and reversed in this case or the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, or both, erred in not staying the prosecution of the suit in the latter named jurisdiction until final judgment has been rendered in the first mentioned jurisdiction, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, upon the plainest principles of judicial comity, should not and will not attempt to interfere with an action now pending on appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit; ■
Accordingly, the motion to dismiss the appeal in this cause is granted; and the appeal is consequently dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
201 F.2d 55, 96 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arthur-kahn-co-inc-v-switzer-brothers-inc-ca6-1952.