Arthur James v. State of Florida
This text of Arthur James v. State of Florida (Arthur James v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D18-4179 _____________________________
ARTHUR JAMES,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel— Original Jurisdiction.
July 9, 2019
PER CURIAM.
DENIED. See Knight v. State, 267 So. 3d 38 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018), review granted, No. SC18-309 (Fla. June 25, 2018).
WETHERELL, OSTERHAUS, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Arthur James, pro se, Petitioner.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Tallahassee Bureau Chief, Criminal Appeals, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Arthur James v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arthur-james-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2019.