Arthur James v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 9, 2019·No. 18-4179·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

No. 1D18-4179

ARTHUR JAMES, Petitioner, v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel— Original Jurisdiction.

July 9, 2019

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. See Knight v. State, 267 So. 3d 38 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018), review granted, No. SC18-309 (Fla. June 25, 2018).

WETHERELL, OSTERHAUS, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Arthur James, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Tallahassee Bureau Chief, Criminal Appeals, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arthur James v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Arthur James v. State of Florida (Arthur James v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arnold Jerome Knight v. State of Florida
267 So. 3d 38 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)