Arthur James Place v. United States

Tenth Circuit

Arthur James Place v. United States

230 F.2d 956

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 12, 1955

Docket5228

StatusPublished

This text of 230 F.2d 956 (Arthur James Place v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arthur James Place v. United States, 230 F.2d 956 (10th Cir. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

230 F.2d 956

Arthur James PLACE
v.
UNITED STATES of America.

No. 5228.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

Sept. 12, 1955.

No appearance for appellant.

William C. Farmer, U.S. Atty., Topeka, Kan., for appellee.

Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and HUXMAN, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Docketed and dismissed, on motion of appellee for failure of appellant diligently to prosecute.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

230 F.2d 956

Arthur James PLACE
v.
UNITED STATES of America.

No. 5228.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

Sept. 12, 1955.

No appearance for appellant.

William C. Farmer, U.S. Atty., Topeka, Kan., for appellee.

Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and HUXMAN, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Docketed and dismissed, on motion of appellee for failure of appellant diligently to prosecute.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

230 F.2d 956, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arthur-james-place-v-united-states-ca10-1955.