Arthur Jaffee Associates v. Bilsco Auto Service, Inc.
This text of 448 N.E.2d 792 (Arthur Jaffee Associates v. Bilsco Auto Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
[995]*995The Appellate Division properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The motion papers presented no question of fact for trial sufficient to negate the validity and binding effect of the disclaimer of warranty coverage. In addition, on the facts of this case, there being no privity between the purchaser and the defendant there can be no implied warranty.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons concur.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
448 N.E.2d 792, 58 N.Y.2d 993, 461 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 2944, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arthur-jaffee-associates-v-bilsco-auto-service-inc-ny-1983.