Arthur Jaffe, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Arthur Jaffe, Inc. v. United States

26 Cust. Ct. 385, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 368

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMarch 20, 1951

DocketNo. 55376; protests 156423-K and 161016-K (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 26 Cust. Ct. 385 (Arthur Jaffe, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arthur Jaffe, Inc. v. United States, 26 Cust. Ct. 385, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 368 (cusc 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Rao, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of lithographic prints, not exceeding twelve one-thousandths of an inch in thickness, the same in all material respects as those the subject of Arthur Jaffe, Inc. v. United States (25 Cust. Ct. 62, C. D. 1264). Subsequent to the submission [386]*386of these cases, counsel for the plaintiff specifically waived all claims with respect to the item designated as “Central Park” on the invoice covered by protest ’156423-K. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the cited authority the claims of the plaintiff were sustained, except as to the above-enumerated item.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Rao, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of lithographic prints, not exceeding twelve one-thousandths of an inch in thickness, the same in all material respects as those the subject of Arthur Jaffe, Inc. v. United States (25 Cust. Ct. 62, C. D. 1264). Subsequent to the submission [386]*386of these cases, counsel for the plaintiff specifically waived all claims with respect to the item designated as “Central Park” on the invoice covered by protest ’156423-K. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the cited authority the claims of the plaintiff were sustained, except as to the above-enumerated item.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 Cust. Ct. 385, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arthur-jaffe-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1951.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack