Arthur Jackson v. J. Gonzalez

404 F. App'x 244
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedNovember 23, 2010
Docket09-56157
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 404 F. App'x 244 (Arthur Jackson v. J. Gonzalez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arthur Jackson v. J. Gonzalez, 404 F. App'x 244 (9th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Arthur Duane Jackson, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleg *245 ing denial of access to courts. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We may affirm on any grounds supported by the record. Atel Fin. Corp. v. Quaker Coal Co., 321 F.3d 924, 926 (9th Cir.2003) (per curiam). We review de novo, Midwater Trawlers Coop. v. Dep’t of Commerce, 393 F.3d 994, 1002 (9th Cir.2004), and we affirm.

The only issue open on remand was whether Jackson was unable to bring a claim in state court because defendants allegedly denied him access to some of his legal materials. Jackson has not raised this issue on appeal, and thus it is waived. See McKay v. Inglesan, 558 F.3d 888, 891 n. 5 (2009).

Jackson’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jackson v. Gonzalez
181 L. Ed. 2d 84 (Supreme Court, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
404 F. App'x 244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arthur-jackson-v-j-gonzalez-ca9-2010.