Arthur Jackson v. J. Gonzalez
This text of 404 F. App'x 244 (Arthur Jackson v. J. Gonzalez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Arthur Duane Jackson, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleg *245 ing denial of access to courts. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We may affirm on any grounds supported by the record. Atel Fin. Corp. v. Quaker Coal Co., 321 F.3d 924, 926 (9th Cir.2003) (per curiam). We review de novo, Midwater Trawlers Coop. v. Dep’t of Commerce, 393 F.3d 994, 1002 (9th Cir.2004), and we affirm.
The only issue open on remand was whether Jackson was unable to bring a claim in state court because defendants allegedly denied him access to some of his legal materials. Jackson has not raised this issue on appeal, and thus it is waived. See McKay v. Inglesan, 558 F.3d 888, 891 n. 5 (2009).
Jackson’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
404 F. App'x 244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arthur-jackson-v-j-gonzalez-ca9-2010.