Arthur J. Palmer v. United States
332 F.2d 788
Opinion
The order denying appellant’s motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is affirmed.
We are satisfied that the court’s finding that Palmer’s plea was entered understandingly and voluntarily is correct.
We find no merit in Palmer’s contention that 26 U.S.C. § 4724 violates the Fifth Amendment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Arthur J. Palmer v. United States, 332 F.2d 788 (9th Cir. 1964).
332 F.2d 788 (Arthur J. Palmer v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Clark
294 F. Supp. 1108 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1968)
David Browning v. United States
366 F.2d 420 (Ninth Circuit, 1966)
Arthur J. Palmer v. United States
345 F.2d 514 (Ninth Circuit, 1965)