Arthur J. Fritz & Co. v. United States
61 Cust. Ct. 670, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1666
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedDecember 4, 1968
DocketNo. P68/504; protests 62/690, etc. (Honolulu)
StatusPublished
This text of 61 Cust. Ct. 670 (Arthur J. Fritz & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Arthur J. Fritz & Co. v. United States, 61 Cust. Ct. 670, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1666 (cusc 1968).
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of wooden doors similar in all material respects to those the subject of B. A. McKenzie & Co., Inc. v. United States (58 Cust. Ct. 460, C.D. 3020), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
B. A. McKenzie & Co. v. United States
58 Cust. Ct. 460 (U.S. Customs Court, 1967)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
61 Cust. Ct. 670, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arthur-j-fritz-co-v-united-states-cusc-1968.