Arthur J. Fritz & Co. v. United States

52 Cust. Ct. 305, 1964 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3678
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Arthur J. Fritz & Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 52 Cust. Ct. 61
United States Customs Court·Decided March 31, 1964·No. No. 68405; protest 62/3217·Published

Opinion

Ford, Judge:

The above case was tried in conjunction with, but not consolidated therein, protest 62/3245, decided concurrently with the issuance of this order and reported as Arthur J. Fritz & Co., Inc. v. United States, 52 Cust. Ct. 61, C.D. 2437.

An examination of the official papers in this matter indicates that the merchandise was invoiced as “Wool Bag Bugs.” Said merchandise purports to be identical with that involved in C.D. 2437, supra. However, such designation is insufficient to establish the merchandise to be in chief value of wool.

Accordingly, in the interests of justice, this ease should be restored to the next calendar of the court to be held at Seattle, Wash., for the purpose of establishing the component material of chief value.

Order will issue accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arthur J. Fritz & Co. v. United States, 52 Cust. Ct. 305, 1964 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3678 (cusc 1964).

52 Cust. Ct. 305 (Arthur J. Fritz & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arthur J. Fritz & Co. v. United States
52 Cust. Ct. 61 (U.S. Customs Court, 1964)