Arthur Hairston, Sr. v. Railroad Retirement Board

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: June 20, 2023
• Docket: 22-2038
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 22-2038 Doc: 10 Filed: 06/20/2023 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-2038

ARTHUR LEE HAIRSTON, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, District Judge. (3:22-cv-00019-GMG-RWT)

Submitted: June 15, 2023 Decided: June 20, 2023

Before DIAZ, RICHARDSON, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Erin K. Reisenweber, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-2038 Doc: 10 Filed: 06/20/2023 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint

for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Hairston v. R.R. Ret. Bd., No.

3:22-cv-00019-GMG-RWT (N.D.W. Va. Sept. 22, 2022). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED