Arthur H. Shapiro v. Jake S. Finke, Also Known as Jack S. Finke

Eighth Circuit

Arthur H. Shapiro v. Jake S. Finke, Also Known as Jack S. Finke

239 F.2d 643

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided November 8, 1956·No. 15590·Published

Opinion

239 F.2d 643

Arthur H. SHAPIRO et al., Appellants,
v.
Jake S. FINKE, also known as Jack S. Finke.

No. 15590.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

November 8, 1956.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Milton Yawitz, Elliot P. Koenig, St. Louis, Mo., Bernard G. Sang and Vincent J. Carney, Chicago, Ill., for appellants.

Charles S. Sigoloff, Merle L. Silverstein, Lawrence C. Kingsland, Edmund C. Rogers and Estill E. Ezell, St. Louis, Mo., for appellee.

Appeal from District Court dismissed without taxation of costs in favor of either of the parties and with prejudice, on stipulation of parties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

239 F.2d 643

Arthur H. SHAPIRO et al., Appellants,
v.
Jake S. FINKE, also known as Jack S. Finke.

No. 15590.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

November 8, 1956.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Milton Yawitz, Elliot P. Koenig, St. Louis, Mo., Bernard G. Sang and Vincent J. Carney, Chicago, Ill., for appellants.

Charles S. Sigoloff, Merle L. Silverstein, Lawrence C. Kingsland, Edmund C. Rogers and Estill E. Ezell, St. Louis, Mo., for appellee.

Appeal from District Court dismissed without taxation of costs in favor of either of the parties and with prejudice, on stipulation of parties.

Arthur H. Shapiro v. Jake S. Finke, Also Known as Jack S. Finke, 239 F.2d 643 (8th Cir. 1956).

Pincite

239 F.2d 643 (Arthur H. Shapiro v. Jake S. Finke, Also Known as Jack S. Finke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.