Arthur Forman Enterprises, Inc. v. The United States, Arthur Forman Enterprises, Inc. v. The United States, and Affiliated Textile, Inc.

Federal Circuit

Arthur Forman Enterprises, Inc. v. The United States, Arthur Forman Enterprises, Inc. v. The United States, and Affiliated Textile, Inc.

960 F.2d 154, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 33194

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedSeptember 4, 1991

Docket91-5109

StatusUnpublished

This text of 960 F.2d 154 (Arthur Forman Enterprises, Inc. v. The United States, Arthur Forman Enterprises, Inc. v. The United States, and Affiliated Textile, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arthur Forman Enterprises, Inc. v. The United States, Arthur Forman Enterprises, Inc. v. The United States, and Affiliated Textile, Inc., 960 F.2d 154, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 33194 (Fed. Cir. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

960 F.2d 154

NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
ARTHUR FORMAN ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant.
ARTHUR FORMAN ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Defendant,
and
Affiliated Textile, Inc., Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 91-5109, 91-5117.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Sept. 4, 1991.

22 Cl.Ct. 816.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Upon consideration of the joint motion of the parties to vacate the Claims Court judgment and remand with instructions to dismiss the complaint with prejudice, based on settlement,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The judgment of the Claims Court, Arthur Forman Enterprises, Inc. v. United States, 22 Cl.Ct. 816 (1991) vacated.

(2) The case is remanded to the Claims Court with instruct to dismiss the complaint with prejudice.

(3) Each party shall bear its own costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

960 F.2d 154

NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
ARTHUR FORMAN ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant.
ARTHUR FORMAN ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Defendant,
and
Affiliated Textile, Inc., Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 91-5109, 91-5117.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Sept. 4, 1991.

22 Cl.Ct. 816.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Upon consideration of the joint motion of the parties to vacate the Claims Court judgment and remand with instructions to dismiss the complaint with prejudice, based on settlement,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The judgment of the Claims Court, Arthur Forman Enterprises, Inc. v. United States, 22 Cl.Ct. 816 (1991) vacated.

(2) The case is remanded to the Claims Court with instruct to dismiss the complaint with prejudice.

(3) Each party shall bear its own costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

960 F.2d 154, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 33194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arthur-forman-enterprises-inc-v-the-united-states--cafc-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack