Arthur E. Collins v. C. H. Looney, Warden, U.S. Penitentiary

Tenth Circuit

Arthur E. Collins v. C. H. Looney, Warden, U.S. Penitentiary

249 F.2d 319

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 7, 1957

Docket5659

StatusPublished

This text of 249 F.2d 319 (Arthur E. Collins v. C. H. Looney, Warden, U.S. Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arthur E. Collins v. C. H. Looney, Warden, U.S. Penitentiary, 249 F.2d 319 (10th Cir. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

249 F.2d 319

Arthur E. COLLINS
v.
C. H. LOONEY, Warden, U.S. Penitentiary, et al.

No. 5659.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

Sept. 7, 1957.

William C. Farmer, U.S. Atty., Topeka, Kan., and Milton P. Beach, Asst. U.S. Atty., Kansas City, Kan., for appellees.

Before MURRAH, PICKETT and LEWIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed on motion of appellees on ground appeal is moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

249 F.2d 319

Arthur E. COLLINS
v.
C. H. LOONEY, Warden, U.S. Penitentiary, et al.

No. 5659.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

Sept. 7, 1957.

William C. Farmer, U.S. Atty., Topeka, Kan., and Milton P. Beach, Asst. U.S. Atty., Kansas City, Kan., for appellees.

Before MURRAH, PICKETT and LEWIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed on motion of appellees on ground appeal is moot.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 F.2d 319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arthur-e-collins-v-c-h-looney-warden-us-penitentia-ca10-1957.