ARTHUR DEBOSE v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 14, 2021·No. 20-1594·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed April 14, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-1594 Lower Tribunal No. F11-13229B ________________

Arthur DeBose, Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida, Appellee.

An appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Miguel M. de la O, Judge.

Arthur DeBose, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Gabrielle Raemy Charest- Turken, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCALES, MILLER, and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Tundidor v. State, 221 So. 3d 587, 605 (Fla. 2017)

(“[T]he error is harmless if the record conclusively shows that the trial court

would have imposed the same sentence using a corrected scoresheet.”)

(citation omitted); Kablitz v. State, 979 So. 2d 969, 972 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)

(Defendant “alleges errors in his scoresheet. However, as to these, we

conclude that the state has shown that the same sentence would have

been imposed had the corrections been made.”) (citing State v. Anderson,

905 So. 2d 111 (Fla. 2005)).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ARTHUR DEBOSE v. State, (Fla. Ct. App. 2021).

ARTHUR DEBOSE v. State (ARTHUR DEBOSE v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Anderson
905 So. 2d 111 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)
Kablitz v. State
979 So. 2d 969 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Randy W. Tundidor v. State of Florida
221 So. 3d 587 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2017)