ARTHUR DEBOSE v. State
This text of ARTHUR DEBOSE v. State (ARTHUR DEBOSE v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed April 14, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D20-1594 Lower Tribunal No. F11-13229B ________________
Arthur DeBose, Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida, Appellee.
An appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Miguel M. de la O, Judge.
Arthur DeBose, in proper person.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Gabrielle Raemy Charest- Turken, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SCALES, MILLER, and LOBREE, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Tundidor v. State, 221 So. 3d 587, 605 (Fla. 2017)
(“[T]he error is harmless if the record conclusively shows that the trial court
would have imposed the same sentence using a corrected scoresheet.”)
(citation omitted); Kablitz v. State, 979 So. 2d 969, 972 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)
(Defendant “alleges errors in his scoresheet. However, as to these, we
conclude that the state has shown that the same sentence would have
been imposed had the corrections been made.”) (citing State v. Anderson,
905 So. 2d 111 (Fla. 2005)).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ARTHUR DEBOSE v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arthur-debose-v-state-fladistctapp-2021.