Arthur Cann v. State
This text of Arthur Cann v. State (Arthur Cann v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-13-00151-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
ARTHUR CANN, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
On appeal from the 148th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.
ORDER Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Longoria Order Per Curiam
The Honorable Stan Turpen, counsel for appellant, Arthur Cann, has filed a motion
to withdraw as counsel in this cause and extend time to file appellant’s brief. According
to the motion to withdraw, counsel was appointed to represent appellant and there is not
a workable attorney client relationship. Counsel requests permission to withdraw and that another attorney be appointed for purposes of appeal. We GRANT the motion for
extension of time to file the brief and ABATE and REMAND this cause as follows.
Upon remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever means necessary to make
appropriate findings and recommendations concerning the following: (1) whether
appellant desires to prosecute this appeal; (2) whether appellant has been denied
effective assistance of counsel; and (3) whether appellant is indigent and entitled to
court-appointed counsel.
If the trial court determines that appellant does want to continue the appeal and
that appellant is indigent and entitled to court-appointed counsel, the trial court shall
appoint new counsel to represent appellant in this appeal. If new counsel is appointed,
the name, address, telephone number, and state bar number of said counsel shall be
included in an order appointing counsel.
The trial court shall cause its findings and recommendations, together with any
orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues, to be included in a supplemental
clerk's record. Furthermore, the trial court shall cause a supplemental reporter's record
of any proceedings to be prepared. The supplemental clerk's record and supplemental
reporter's record, if any, shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before the
expiration of thirty days from the date of this order.
It is so ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the 10th day of February, 2013.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Arthur Cann v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arthur-cann-v-state-texapp-2014.