Arthur C. Paulos v. United States
This text of 354 F.2d 661 (Arthur C. Paulos v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
354 F.2d 661
Arthur C. PAULOS et al., Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 20139.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
January 7, 1966.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington; William J. Lindberg, Judge.
Irving C. Paul, Jr., Seattle, Wash., for appellant.
William N. Goodwin, U. S. Atty., Gerald W. Hess, Asst. U. S. Atty., Seattle, Wash., for appellee.
Before BARNES, KOELSCH and BROWNING, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The evidence being sufficient to support the verdict, and there being no legal question of substance raised on appeal, we affirm the judgment rendered by the District Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
354 F.2d 661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arthur-c-paulos-v-united-states-ca9-1966.