Home/Ninth Circuit/Arthur C. Paulos v. United States

Arthur C. Paulos v. United States

354 F.2d 661
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 7, 1966·No. 20139·Published

Opinion

354 F.2d 661

Arthur C. PAULOS et al., Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 20139.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

January 7, 1966.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington; William J. Lindberg, Judge.

Irving C. Paul, Jr., Seattle, Wash., for appellant.

William N. Goodwin, U. S. Atty., Gerald W. Hess, Asst. U. S. Atty., Seattle, Wash., for appellee.

Before BARNES, KOELSCH and BROWNING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The evidence being sufficient to support the verdict, and there being no legal question of substance raised on appeal, we affirm the judgment rendered by the District Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arthur C. Paulos v. United States, 354 F.2d 661 (9th Cir. 1966).

354 F.2d 661 (Arthur C. Paulos v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.