Arthur Britt v. State of Florida
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
ARTHUR BRITT, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
v. CASE NO. 1D15-2827
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
_____________________________/
Opinion filed October 7, 2016.
An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Angela Cox, Judge.
Diana L. Johnson of Johnson and Lufrano, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Virginia Chester Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Based on the State’s proper concession of error, we reverse and remand for
resentencing on Counts I and II in accordance with Williams v. State, 186 So. 3d 989 (Fla. 2016), which held that consecutive mandatory minimum terms under the
10-20-Life statute are permissible but not mandatory where, as here, the defendant
shot at multiple victims. In all other respects, we affirm.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED and REMANDED in part.
ROBERTS, C.J., WETHERELL, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Arthur Britt v. State of Florida (Arthur Britt v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.