Arthur Bickart v. Union Barge Line Corporation
209 F.2d 957, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 3692
Opinion
The district judge found that the date of appellant’s maximum recovery from the injury involved was September 8, 1946; that the amount due him in this action for maintenance and cure was $575,' and that there was ho proof that the massage- and heat applications, self administered, under which further maintenance is claimed' were curative treatments. There is substantial evidence to justify those findings.
The judgment of the district court, 110 F.Supp. 942, will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Arthur Bickart v. Union Barge Line Corporation, 209 F.2d 957, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 3692 (3d Cir. 1954).
209 F.2d 957 (Arthur Bickart v. Union Barge Line Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bickart v. Union Barge Line Corp.
110 F. Supp. 942 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1953)