Arthur Bary Etc. v. United States of America. Anna Bary v. United States of America. Harold Zepelin Etc. v. United States of America. Lewis Martin Johnson v. United States

218 F.2d 605
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedNovember 16, 1954
Docket5030_1
StatusPublished

This text of 218 F.2d 605 (Arthur Bary Etc. v. United States of America. Anna Bary v. United States of America. Harold Zepelin Etc. v. United States of America. Lewis Martin Johnson v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arthur Bary Etc. v. United States of America. Anna Bary v. United States of America. Harold Zepelin Etc. v. United States of America. Lewis Martin Johnson v. United States, 218 F.2d 605 (10th Cir. 1954).

Opinion

218 F.2d 605

Arthur BARY etc.
v.
UNITED STATES of America.
Anna BARY
v.
UNITED STATES of America.
Harold ZEPELIN etc.
v.
UNITED STATES of America.
Lewis Martin JOHNSON
v.
UNITED STATES of America.

No. 5027.

No. 5030.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

November 16, 1954.

George R. Andersen, San Francisco, Cal., and Charles D. Montfort, Denver, Colo., for appellants.

Donald E. Kelley, U. S. Atty., and Robert Swanson, Asst. U. S. Atty., Denver, Colo., for appellee.

Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and BRATTON and PICKETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Order denying motion for reduction of bail affirmed without written opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
218 F.2d 605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arthur-bary-etc-v-united-states-of-america-anna-bary-v-united-states-of-ca10-1954.