Arthur Baker v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections

Fifth Circuit

Arthur Baker v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections

363 F.2d 877

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 8, 1966·No. 23117_1·Published

Opinion

BY THE COURT;

Treating appellant’s letter of May 28, 1966, as a motion to vacate the continuance of the submission of his appeal previously assigned for submission on May 20,1966,

It is ordered that the said motion be, and the same is hereby granted and the case has been considered on the original record and briefs of the parties.

The Judgment of the trial court is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BY THE COURT;

Treating appellant’s letter of May 28, 1966, as a motion to vacate the continuance of the submission of his appeal previously assigned for submission on May 20,1966,

It is ordered that the said motion be, and the same is hereby granted and the case has been considered on the original record and briefs of the parties.

The Judgment of the trial court is

Affirmed.

Arthur Baker v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, 363 F.2d 877 (5th Cir. 1966).

Pincite

363 F.2d 877 (Arthur Baker v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.