Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Donald Vincent, Trustee of Chemo Puro Manufacturing Corporation, Bankrupt
This text of 313 F.2d 631 (Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Donald Vincent, Trustee of Chemo Puro Manufacturing Corporation, Bankrupt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
313 F.2d 631
ARTHUR ANDERSEN & CO., Appellant,
v.
Donald VINCENT, Trustee of Chemo Puro Manufacturing
Corporation, Bankrupt, Appellee.
No. 179, Docket 27761.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued Jan. 9, 1963.
Decided Jan. 11, 1963.
Dunnington, Bartholow & Miller, New York City (Charles G. Pillon, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
David W. Kahn, New York City, for appellee.
Before CLARK, KAUFMAN and HAYS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the judgment of the district court in favor of the trustee in bankruptcy and against Arthur Andersen & Co., the purported claimant, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Chief Judge Ryan, In re Chemo Puro Mfg. Corp., D.C.S.D.N.Y., 213 F.Supp. 845.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
313 F.2d 631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arthur-andersen-co-v-donald-vincent-trustee-of-chemo-puro-ca2-1963.