Arthur A. D. v. Karen D.

New York Court of Appeals

Arthur A. D. v. Karen D.

65 N.Y. 1024

New York Court of Appeals·Decided September 12, 1985·Published

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal denied, with $20 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements. On the court’s own motion, appeal taken as of right from the judgment entered July 17, 1985 dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the Appellate Division order sought to be reviewed does not “satisf [y] the requirements of subdivision (a) [of CPLR 5601]” (CPLR 5601 [d]) in that the modification at the Appellate Division is not in a “respect which is within the power of the court of appeals to review” (CPLR 5601 [a] [iii]; Patron v Patron, 40 NY2d 582).

Judge Titone taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for leave to appeal denied, with $20 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements. On the court’s own motion, appeal taken as of right from the judgment entered July 17, 1985 dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the Appellate Division order sought to be reviewed does not “satisf [y] the requirements of subdivision (a) [of CPLR 5601]” (CPLR 5601 [d]) in that the modification at the Appellate Division is not in a “respect which is within the power of the court of appeals to review” (CPLR 5601 [a] [iii]; Patron v Patron, 40 NY2d 582).

Judge Titone taking no part.

Arthur A. D. v. Karen D., 65 N.Y. 1024 (N.Y. 1985).

Pincite

65 N.Y. 1024 (Arthur A. D. v. Karen D.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related