Artho v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Artho v. State

1 S.W.2d 629, 108 Tex. Crim. 463, 1928 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 26

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJanuary 4, 1928

DocketNo. 11319.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 S.W.2d 629 (Artho v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Artho v. State, 1 S.W.2d 629, 108 Tex. Crim. 463, 1928 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 26 (Tex. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for possessing intoxicating liquor for purpose of sale, punishment one year in the penitentiary. Appellant’s motion for new trial was overruled on May 17, 1927. The statement of facts shows to have been filed on *464 August 17, 1927. The statute allows ninety days for the filing of statement of facts, after the overruling of the motion for new trial. The statement of facts was filed two days too late. Same cannot be considered.

There are three bills of exception. Each has been carefully considered. We find nothing in any calling for discussion here. None present error.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI