Artecona Jr., Cid Solano v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 10, 2013·No. 05-09-01283-CR·Published

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

NO. WR-78,833-01

EX PARTE CID ARTECONA , Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 052550 IN THE 15TH DISTRICT COURT FROM GRAYSON COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ ofhabeas corpus. Exparte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two counts of

aggravated sexual assault and sentenced to imprisonment for life on each count. The Fifth Court of

Appeals affirmed his convictions. Artecona v. State, No. 05-09-01283-CR (Tex. App.—Dallas

2011, no pet).

Applicant contends that he was denied the opportunity to file a pro se petition for

discretionary review (PDR). We remanded this application for findings of fact and conclusions of

law. After reviewing the record, we conclude that Applicant was denied the opportunity to file apro P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 WR-78,833-01 5TH COURT OF APPEALS CLERK LISA MATZ 600 COMMERCE 2ND FLOOR DALLAS TX 75202 5B DQW-N3B -7S3202: ||v,lii|i!fi|l|1.1t|.it1ali.i.|....lil|<1Bli>.i|liiit---alf->tls>

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Artecona Jr., Cid Solano v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Artecona Jr., Cid Solano v. State (Artecona Jr., Cid Solano v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)