Arteaga v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Arteaga v. State

521 S.W.3d 368, 2017 WL 2462324, 2017 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 534

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJune 7, 2017

DocketNO. PD-1649-15

StatusPublished

This text of 521 S.W.3d 368 (Arteaga v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arteaga v. State, 521 S.W.3d 368, 2017 WL 2462324, 2017 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 534 (Tex. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

Hervey, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court

in which Keller, P.J., Alcala, Richardson, Yeary, Newell, Keel, Walker, JJ., joined.

Appellant, Robert Michael Arteaga, was tried in a consolidated trial on two indictments for sexual assault of a child and possession of child pornography. In two grounds for review, he sought to challenge his sexual-assault convictions and his convictions for possession of child pornography. However, because we granted review to examine only Arteaga’s convictions for sexual assault of a child, our decision to grant review in PD-1649-15 dealing with Arteaga’s possession-of-child-pornography convictions was improvident. We therefore dismiss as improvidently granted Artea-ga’s petition for discretionary review docketed as PD-1649-15.

Keasler, J., did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

Hervey, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court

in which Keller, P.J., Alcala, Richardson, Yeary, Newell, Keel, Walker, JJ., joined.

Appellant, Robert Michael Arteaga, was tried in a consolidated trial on two indictments for sexual assault of a child and possession of child pornography. In two grounds for review, he sought to challenge his sexual-assault convictions and his convictions for possession of child pornography. However, because we granted review to examine only Arteaga’s convictions for sexual assault of a child, our decision to grant review in PD-1649-15 dealing with Arteaga’s possession-of-child-pornography convictions was improvident. We therefore dismiss as improvidently granted Artea-ga’s petition for discretionary review docketed as PD-1649-15.

Keasler, J., did not participate.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

521 S.W.3d 368, 2017 WL 2462324, 2017 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arteaga-v-state-texcrimapp-2017.