Arteaga v. Adom Rental Transportation, Inc.

121 A.D.3d 931, 993 N.Y.S.2d 916
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 22, 2014
Docket2014-04046
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 121 A.D.3d 931 (Arteaga v. Adom Rental Transportation, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arteaga v. Adom Rental Transportation, Inc., 121 A.D.3d 931, 993 N.Y.S.2d 916 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Butler, J.), entered March 6, 2014, as denied his motion pursuant to CFLR 3215 (f) for leave to enter a judgment on the issue of liability against the defendants upon their failure to appear or answer, and granted that branch of the defendants’ cross motion which was pursuant to CFLR 3012 (d) to compel the plaintiff to accept their late answer.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

In light of the lack of prejudice to the plaintiff resulting from the defendants’ short delays in answering the complaint, the lack of willfulness on the part of the defendants, the existence of a potentially meritorious defense, and the public policy favoring the resolution of cases on the merits, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiff’s motion pursuant to CFLR 3215 (f) for leave to enter a default judgment on the issue of liability against the defendants, and granting that branch of the defendants’ cross motion which was *932 pursuant to CPLR 3012 (d) to compel the plaintiff to accept their late answer (see CPLR 2004, 3012 [d]; Klein v Yeshiva M’kor Chaim, 116 AD3d 672 [2014]; Schonfeld v Blue & White Food Prods. Corp., 29 AD3d 673, 674 [2006]; Yonkers Rib House, Inc. v 1789 Cent. Park Corp., 19 AD3d 687, 688 [2005]).

Rivera, J.P, Hall, Austin, Miller and Maltese, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mid-Hudson Props., Inc. v. Klein
2018 NY Slip Op 8638 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Government Employees Ins. Co. v. Avenue C Med., P.C.
2018 NY Slip Op 8010 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Stavola v. Bodd
2018 NY Slip Op 5617 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Spence v. Davis
139 A.D.3d 703 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Alonso v. Lorimik Realty Corp.
131 A.D.3d 496 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
121 A.D.3d 931, 993 N.Y.S.2d 916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arteaga-v-adom-rental-transportation-inc-nyappdiv-2014.