Artco, Inc. v. Phillips

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Artco, Inc. v. Phillips

98 So. 2d 398

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 5, 1957

DocketNo. 57-76

StatusPublished

This text of 98 So. 2d 398 (Artco, Inc. v. Phillips) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Artco, Inc. v. Phillips, 98 So. 2d 398 (Fla. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the joint motion of the appellees to affirm the Amended Order Confirming Sale Nunc Pro Tunc appealed from pursuant to Rule 3.9, subd. (c) of the rules of this Court, and it appearing to the Court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;

It is accordingly Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the motion to affirm the amended order confirming sale nunc pro tunc appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the order is

Affirmed.

CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the joint motion of the appellees to affirm the Amended Order Confirming Sale Nunc Pro Tunc appealed from pursuant to Rule 3.9, subd. (c) of the rules of this Court, and it appearing to the Court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;

It is accordingly Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the motion to affirm the amended order confirming sale nunc pro tunc appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the order is

Affirmed.

CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

98 So. 2d 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/artco-inc-v-phillips-fladistctapp-1957.