Artamount, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Artamount, Inc. v. United States

37 Cust. Ct. 399

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedOctober 25, 1956

DocketNo. 60297; protest 261078-K (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 37 Cust. Ct. 399 (Artamount, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Artamount, Inc. v. United States, 37 Cust. Ct. 399 (cusc 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

The uncontradicted testimony established that the articles in question are folding combs, designed to be carried in women’s handbags, and that they are exclusively used for combing hair and never as hair ornaments. The parties conceded that the combs are composed in chief value of metal and are valued above 20 cents per dozen pieces. On the record presented, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

The uncontradicted testimony established that the articles in question are folding combs, designed to be carried in women’s handbags, and that they are exclusively used for combing hair and never as hair ornaments. The parties conceded that the combs are composed in chief value of metal and are valued above 20 cents per dozen pieces. On the record presented, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 Cust. Ct. 399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/artamount-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1956.